Search for: "Doe PL" Results 1 - 20 of 927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 2:56 am by Jeremy Saland
Remember, merely because a Petit Larceny is not a felony, but a misdemeanor, does not mean you should relax your defenses and shrug your shoulders in indifference. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:18 am by Paralegal Mentor
Tanya obtained her PLS certification and the NALS Continuing Legal Education Award in 2009. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:56 am by Jeremy Saland
Remember, merely because a Petit Larceny is not a felony, but a misdemeanor, does not mean you should relax your defenses and shrug your shoulders in indifference. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:45 am
With that being said, the Court continued to write that although the physical contact in this case may be offensive, it does not rise to the level of physical menacing. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:29 am by Jeremy Saland
” If speech does not qualify as one of the proscribed categories of prohibited speech then it is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 2:57 am by Jeremy Saland
Not only are the alleged threats made in an NY PL 240.30 investigation relevant down to the exact words used and the context of declaration, but this offense is just as likely to involve a Desk Appearance Ticket based arrest as it is a Domestic Violence one. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:23 am
The law involving drug possession crimes (whether NY PL 220.03 for controlled substance or NY PL 221.10 for marijuana) definitely favors the prosecution. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The defendants did not seem to have run a qualified privilege defence at common law, which might have faired better because it does not have the reasonableness requirement. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by Kate Fort
Thus, we reject Doe’s argument that the magistrate court erred in exercising jurisdiction in this case. [read post]